Western Civilization’s Unrelenting Expansion – Part 4 For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming
themselves into the apostles of Christ (2 Corinthians 11:13).
Some branches of human knowledge are nearly impossible for all but a few to understand. When Albert Einstein introduced his theory of relativity, there were only a few scientists who could grasp its implications. Although researchers have had more than 100 years to travel the learning curve of relativity, its counter-intuitive nature is still extremely difficult for many people to comprehend.
If at the threshold of the 19th Century I had offered a hand-held gadget that I called a mobile phone and promoted it as a device that offered instant communication with someone who was virtually anywhere on earth, I’d have been viewed in the same light as a salesman peddling a bogus cure for impotence. However, two centuries later, mobile phone technology has evolved into an indispensable component of our human landscape; yet, most people do not understand the technological process behind its ease of use: to over-simply the electronic wizardry behind a cell phone—it converts spoken words into digital data, or zeroes and ones, called bits, and then transmits that data pack to a relay station, where it is relayed further to other stations or to a satellite, which then transmits the zeroes and ones back to another mobile phone, where the digital data is translated back into intelligible conversation.
And if life lasts another thousand years, we can only imagine the inexplicable discoveries and technologies that will have been developed, from populating planets in distant galaxies with human life to traveling back and forth through time. However, not all mind-bending concepts are as benign as mobile phone technology.
It could be reasonably argued that preceding World War II, Germany was at the pinnacle of Western culture: It gave the world Bach and Beethoven; Bavarian Motor Works and Daimler Benz; Einstein and Marx; aspirin and x-rays; and a host of other artists, concepts and products. However, Adolf Hitler was able to convince millions of people of the virtue of eliminating the Jewish population from the earth. And more than 60 years later, historians are still bewildered by the notion that a man would nearly realize his ambition of total Jewish annihilation and find millions of willing executioners, in an apparently civilized society, to aid him.
In the introduction to this series, I examined Revelation chapter 6, which reveals the four horsemen of the apocalypse. This will be an incomprehensible reign of terror where at least one fourth, and possibly as much as one half, of the world’s population will be killed. If we concede that Hitler, Mao, Stalin, Rhodes or any other despot was evil, Revelation chapter 6 demonstrates a cabal of men who surpass evil. I am certain that I could say without fear of contradiction, that most people cannot imagine the pathology that is necessary to intentionally massacre as many as half the people in the earth. It will take a group of purely evil men, whose hearts are divorced from any vestige of morality to kill 3.5 billion people; yet, this is exactly the road that society is traveling. However, the collective attention of society has been intentionally, and I might add, masterfully, divided to keep the masses away from focusing on humanity’s most urgent issues, like its own destruction at the hands of satanically inspired men.
I don’t mean to diminish the significance of the questions of abortion, same-sex marriage, illegal immigration, deficit spending, or any other ‘premium’ social concern, but these issues have been deliberately injected into the social discourse to keep the nations polarized. Consequently, if liberals are fighting conservatives, and the poor are fighting the rich, and whites are fighting blacks, and American citizens are fighting illegal immigrants, then we will never be able to focus on the larger social issues: Why gas prices are rising contrary to market forces? Or why a handful of men were permitted to play ‘Russian Roulette’ with the mortgage market and no one has been imprisoned? Or why the U.S. taxpayer was required to rescue the reckless management of our nation’s economy? Or why we invaded Iraq with absolutely no evidence that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction or that he participated in 9/11? Or who are the architects behind the push for globalization and what are their motives.
The answer to any of these questions will give you a glimpse into the pantheon of the Western gods, where the plan for a one-world government resides. As a subtle tribute to this pantheon, Rhodes Scholar and former President Bill Clinton gave a veiled acknowledgment of this antichristic scheme during his 1992 acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention by citing Carroll Quigley:
“As a teenager, I heard John Kennedy’s summons to citizenship. And then, as a student at Georgetown, I heard that call clarified by a professor name [Carroll] Quigley, who said to us that America was the greatest Nation in history because our people had always believed in two things – that tomorrow can be better than today and that every one of us has a personal moral responsibility to make it so.”[i]
Quigley, Clinton’s history professor while at Georgetown University, was given two years to examine Western Civilization’s secret plan to rule the world (see part 10 of this series for more on Carroll Quigley). Clinton’s acknowledgment of Quigley was very significant during his run for president: He campaigned on the theme of “change;” however, he had to assure the Western aristocracy that his mantra was in no way intended to interfere with their policy goals and objectives. Consequently, by invoking Quigley’s name, he signaled to them, that as president of the United States, their aim of bringing the world under the domination of the West would be his top priority. And during his eight-year tenure, he violated the trust of his three largest constituents—African Americans, Labor and the Gay Lobby—while actively promoting the global agenda of the Western aristocracy.
First, Clinton promised to end the military’s ban on gay service personnel; however, once he ran into the opposition, he backpedaled from his support and offered the watered down policy of “Don’t ask, don’t tell,” and then dropped them from his national agenda.
Second, while Clinton was president, he signed two landmark pieces of legislation that adversely affected the African American community: Welfare Reform; and the Crime Bill. And during his tenure, we saw the explosive use of the sentencing disparity between those who were peddling crack (the black side of cocaine), and those who trafficked in powder (the white side of cocaine). Someone who was found guilty of possessing five grams of crack cocaine was given a mandatory sentence of five years in prison; the same sentence for one who was guilty of possessing 500 grams of powdered cocaine.[ii]
The African American community also saw deep erosions in the affirmative action laws that applied to employment, business opportunities and education during Clinton’s presidency. This is disturbing, given the fact that Clinton claimed to support affirmative action. However, the best he could offer in defense of the onslaught to eliminate affirmative action was a clever saying – “Mend but don’t end.”
Clinton’s infidelity towards his African American constituents and the gay community does not necessarily suggest that he pursued an antichristic, global agenda. It simply demonstrated that these two significant allies were not a priority during his administration. However, in what was his most egregious betrayal, his pursuit of free trade agreements, which transplanted American jobs overseas, reflected his responsibility as a Rhodes Scholar to bring the world under Western rule.
During Clinton’s tenure as president, we witnessed an acceleration of entire industries migrating overseas. The labor movement, his largest constituent, watched in horror as he signed the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). NAFTA and GATT are free trade agreements that encourage domestic corporations to move their manufacturing plants overseas and to take advantage of the lower production costs that these free trade agreements made available. They eliminated trade protections that made such moves unfeasible prior to the enactment of the laws, and subsequently permitted American corporations to send hundreds of thousands of jobs overseas without any sanctions.
NAFTA and GATT would appear on their faces to be agreements that would be championed by conservative Republicans. However, Clinton did more to accelerate Western globalization during his eight years as U.S. president than the combined 12 years of Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush. And those who understand that Clinton’s academic roots were nourished through his Rhodes Scholarship will understand that he was simply fulfilling his oath to his secret society when he signed those bills into law.
Notwithstanding Clinton’s apathy, some would say hostility, towards the interests of his constituents, he remains one of the country’s most popular Democrats, which at a deeper level of human nature, reflects the nation’s inability to recognize a fox with the keys to the hen house.
…to be continued
Alexzanda Gordon-King contributed to this article
© 2011 David R. Tolson
[i]http://www.4president.org/speeches/billclinton1992acceptance.htm (The tribute to Quigley can be found towards the end of the speech.)
[ii] The desperate sentencing guidelines seem to betray common logic on a number of fronts: 1) The five-gram threshold is an indiscriminant dragnet that captures the crack user with the “talented” street vendor who may be juggling just enough of his illegal product to claim it is for personal use if apprehended by law enforcement; 2) In a legal system that claims “Justice is blind,” the notion that there is such a considerable distinction between the black side of cocaine and the white side seems to suggest that she peaks every so often; and 3) And more importantly, the sentencing guidelines made the egregious, and possibly illegal, assumption that anyone found with five grams of crack was guilty of trafficking and not simply possession. This is significant given the fact that five grams is less than one-fifth of an ounce, or 0.176 ounces to be exact.
Under the United States Constitution, the presumption of innocence is an implied guarantee for every citizen who has criminal charges leveled against them. Although the constitutional rights to remain silent and to have a jury trial may be extended to an individual possessing five grams of crack, it is a dubious protection given the disparity in sentencing. This institutional bias; some would say racism, strips the possessor of five grams of crack of his presumption of innocence, once we consider the fact that his powder-possessing counterpart is not assumed to be trafficking until his contraband exceeds 500 grams.
Congress had set a self imposed mandate to change the crack-powder disparity by December 31, 1999, which would have altered the guidelines during the Clinton Administration. However, this adjustment was not made until President Barack Obama signed the Fair Sentencing Act on August 3, 2010, nearly 10 years after Clinton left office. However, the disparity was simply reduced and not eliminated: it went from 100:1 to 18:1 under the new law.
No comments:
Post a Comment